11 ways pig farmers can aim for net zero

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the pig industry (for each unit of meat) are lower than the dairy, beef and sheep sectors.

However, there are still ways producers can reduce their carbon footprint.

Improving pig genetics and health, incorporating alternative protein sources into the diet and better handling of manure all have potential to cut GHGs.

But which have the greatest potential, and how do their costs compare?

Research into a range of mitigation strategies was carried out by a group of scientists for the Centre of Innovation and Excellence in Livestock (Ciel), headed by Professor Elizabeth Magowan from the Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (see “Mitigation strategies to reduce GHG emissions in pigs”).

The research shows, for example, genetic improvement could be a low-cost way of reducing methane and nitrous oxide emissions associated with pork production and would also be very easy to implement now.

By contrast, precision feeding and management may be a costly strategy to reduce emissions and is not yet feasible for widescale adoption.

This series takes as its starting point the Centre for Innovation Excellence in Livestock’s recent report Net Zero and Livestock: How Farmers Can Reduce Emissions.

Mitigation strategies to reduce GHG emissions in pigs

Strategy

Cost

Ease of implementation

State of readiness to implement

Potential GHG mitigating effect

Impact on carbon footprint

Other impacts

Accounted for in the National Inventory

Animal

1. Genetic improvement

Low

High

Now

Methane and nitrous oxide reductions

Low

Phosphorus and ammonia reductions

Yes

2. General health improvement

Low

High

Now

Methane and nitrous oxide reductions

Low

Phosphorus and ammonia reductions

Yes

Feed

3. Precision feeding and management to improve feed use efficiency

High

Medium

Later

Methane and nitrous oxide reductions

Low

Phosphorus and ammonia reductions

Yes

4. Specialist ingredients focused on improving feed utilisation

Low

High

Now

Methane and nitrous oxide reductions

Low

Phosphorus and ammonia reductions

Yes

5. Higher co-product inclusion level

Low

Medium

Now

Product dependent

Medium

 

No

6. Use of alternative ingredients to soybean meal

Medium

Medium

Now

Product dependent

High

 

Yes

7. Lower crude protein diet

Low

High

Now

Nitrous oxide reductions

Low

Ammonia reductions

Yes

Manure/fertiliser

8. Anaerobic digestion

High

Medium

Now

Methane reductions

Medium

Odour and ammonia reductions

Yes

9. Acidification

High

Low

Now

Methane reductions

Low

Odour and ammonia reductions

No

10. Covered stores

High

High

Now

Depends on what cover is made of

Low

Odour and ammonia reductions

Yes

11. Low-emission spreading and precision application of manure

High

High

Now

Nitrous oxide reductions

Medium

Ammonia reductions

Yes

Source: Ciel

Notes: 1. Impact on carbon footprint was assessed via a carbon calculator. The National Inventory and inventory accounting are used by the government to measure carbon emissions and carbon capture at a sectoral and national level.

2. Soya bean emissions are often attributed to the country of production, so they will reduce overall pork emissions but have a lesser effect on ‘local’ emissions.

3. Low ease of implementation = more difficult to implement. May require infrastructure or full system changes.

Expert’s view: Stephen Hall, independent pig consultant

Stephen Hall says there is a real opportunity for pig producers to improve the efficiency of their systems, while reducing the emissions associated with pork production.

Below, Mr Hall gives his advice on the strategies for success when it comes to tackling net zero in the pig sector.

Genetic and health improvements

A weakness in our industry is rate of sow retention – it averages around 50% to the fifth parity. There is scope to lift this to about 85%.

Traditionally, we have selected for bigger litters and better feed efficiency in the progeny, but this has compromised the ability to reach the “optimums” that will now help with carbon emissions.

Breeding for longevity now has to be a priority.

Improvements in genetics are happening, and breeding companies are at the frontier of genetic science. But now progress is about working with producers at farm level to get the benefits from this.

By increasing the retention rate, we can reduce the number of sows required within the herd to keep production at the same level. This will be an important mitigation for reducing carbon emissions.

Feeding for efficiency

Simply feeding animals more efficiently for the stage of life they are at will really help on the emissions front. It is possible to be more precise without technology if investment is a barrier.

Practically, this could mean staged feeding during the development of the gilt and then, once she is in her production cycles, feeding her relative to her continued physical development. Factors to consider here are her age at first service, weight, backfat and so on.

Other technologies available now can also help efficiencies. Individual and group sow feeding technology is beneficial for the pig, and also enables producers to develop feed curves for individual animals – driving the overall feeding efficiency.

Managing manure better

One pig unit in China is capturing manure at the point of defecation, by training the pigs to toilet in one specific area. From here, it is separated, and the water purified.

As well as a notable lack of smell reported at these units, it has reduced the lying around and leaking of manure [which is directly related to emissions].

Pigs are clever animals and there is scope to manage them in different ways to benefit emissions.

Pig sector snapshot

The report by the Centre for Innovation Excellence in Livestock, Net Zero and Livestock: How Farmers Can Reduce Emissions, provides a snapshot of the pig sector:

  • UK pigmeat production was valued at £1.4bn in 2020
  • Key challenges include the sector’s contribution to acidification and eutrophication due to emissions of nitrogen and phosphorus from manure
  • Pork is one of the sectors where the differences in carbon footprinting at farm level versus the National Inventory approach are relevant
  • GHG emissions, as determined through the LCA Calculator (life cycle analysis software), are mainly attributed to feed production (about 75-80%)
  • By contrast, direct emissions from UK pig systems, as accounted for under inventory accounting, are mainly aligned with methane from manure and enteric fermentation (digestion), and nitrous oxide as a result of manure application

Explore more / Transition

This article forms part of Farmers Weekly’s Transition series, which looks at how farmers can make their businesses more financially and environmentally sustainable.

During the series we follow our group of 16 Transition Farmers through the challenges and opportunities as they seek to improve their farm businesses.

Transition is an independent editorial initiative supported by our UK-wide network of partners, who have made it possible to bring you this series.

Visit the Transition content hub to find out more.