How much income can nature provide on a commercial farm?
Oxfordshire farm manager Julian Gold is contemplating whether nature can provide the 750ha Hendred Farm Partnership with an income.
Conscious that until now many farming businesses have failed to maintain their natural capital, he is putting that right.
However, he points out that farming doesn’t make enough money in most years to be able to divert some funds back into the environment.
“It hasn’t mattered up to now, but that’s changing,” he says.
“Using a factory analogy, we run a food production line alongside ecosystem services – our factory premises – and we need to maintain those services and put something back, while still operating the production line.”
See also: Biodiversity net gain – legal issues for farmers
Natural capital is variously defined as the elements of renewable and non-renewable natural environment resources (such as plants, animals, air, water, soils, minerals) which offer benefits to society.
Having looked at how the farm is performing, Julian has been able to compare that with what’s on offer in terms of income from agri-environment schemes, carbon trading and biodiversity net gain (BNG).
That information is helping him decide how and where changes are introduced, as well as showing that it is possible to help the business, nature and wider society.
Hendred Farm Partnership – crop margins |
|||
Crop |
Gross margin £/ha |
Operating costs £/ha |
Margin over operating costs £/ha |
Winter wheat |
1,135 |
300 |
835 |
Spring barley |
1,038 |
230 |
808 |
Spring oats |
820 |
230 |
590 |
Winter barley |
667 |
300 |
367 |
Winter OSR |
579 |
300 |
279 |
Winter beans |
337 |
230 |
107 |
Spring beans |
257 |
230 |
27 |
Average margin over operating costs for typical six-year rotation at Hendred = £532/ha |
His figures show that pulse crops are inconsistent and drag down the overall arable margin.
“When you look at how spring beans have performed here, for example, giving us a margin of just £27/ha, it’s clear that payments from environmental schemes such as the Sustainable Farming Incentive [SFI] and Countryside Stewardship [CS] give us the opportunity to replace these low-margin, risky crops,” he says.
“By bringing in legume fallows or winter bird food actions in their place, the environment will benefit and so will the business. They have a margin of £400 to more than £500/ha, depending on which ones you opt for and how you combine them.”
Other SFI or CS options are used to complement existing cropping, such as cover crops, companion planting and no use of insecticide (see table “SFI and CS actions”).
“We don’t use insecticides on this farm, so that’s going to be worth £30,000 to the business,” Julian says. “And cover crops, once the seed and establishment costs have been deducted, will give us £29/ha clear profit.”
However, each action must be considered carefully, he warns. “We’ve had AB8 in-field wildflower strips on the farm for a few years. They cost £776.02/ha, which includes the opportunity cost of the lost crop.
“The SFI and CS payment rates are less than this, so these in-field features are costing the business around £100/ha.”
That said, there is anecdotal evidence these strips are starting to provide agronomic benefits, such as reduced slug pellet use in oilseed rape, he says.
“It’s possibly due to the predation of slugs by beneficial insects using these habitats.”
SFI and CS actions |
|||
Payment rate £/ha |
Annual cost |
Annual margin |
|
Options to replace crops |
|||
NUM3 legume fallow – one year |
593 |
215 |
378 |
NUM3 legume fallow – two years |
593 |
108 |
405 |
AHL2 Winter bird food – one year |
853 |
215 |
638 |
AHL1 Pollen and nectar mix – two years |
739 |
215 |
524 |
SAM3 Herbal ley – two years |
382 |
133 |
249 |
Options to add to spring crops |
|||
SAM2 Cover crops |
129 |
100 |
29 |
Options to add to any crops |
|||
IPM3 Companion crop |
55 |
25 |
30 |
IPM4 No insecticide |
45 |
– |
45 |
AB8 Wildflower strip costs |
||
|
Estimated costs £/ha |
Annual cost £/ha (over five years) |
Shakerator |
36 |
7.20 |
Power harrow |
38 |
7.60 |
Cambridge roll |
9 |
1.80 |
Spray stale seed-bed |
7 |
1.40 |
Broadcast seed |
3.50 |
0.70 |
Cambridge roll x 2 |
18 |
3.60 |
Two litres glyphosate |
8.60 |
1.72 |
Seed (20-40kg/ha) |
350 |
70 |
Annual costs/ha |
||
Mowing, baling and carting – three hours/ha at £50/hr |
150 |
|
Crop margin foregone |
532 |
|
Total annual cost/ha |
776.02 |
|
SFI payment rate |
673 |
|
CS Mid Tier payment rate |
628 |
|
Note: these costs and payment rates were calculated in 2023 |
Julian makes the point that thoughtful integration of SFI and CS is possible. With more SFI actions coming later this year, he is confident there will be much more he can do.
“In the last few years, we have also used hedge planting grants and headland buffer strip payments to link habitats effectively, with minimal sacrifice of crop area.”
Carbon potential
Julian Gold says the business has “dipped its toe in the water” with carbon trading.
“I’ve signed up with Agreena, which works by relating the farming system to expected sequestration,” he says.
“But I’m not selling the certificates yet – they will sit in a drawer until the price per tonne of carbon is higher or we need them to offset the carbon footprint of the wider estate business, which includes a portfolio of old, energy-inefficient houses.”
The first season of carbon trading looks as though it will generate certificates worth £8,000 to £10,000. To increase this figure, Julian would have to reduce his nitrogen fertiliser use significantly.
“If I did that, the farm output would fall and any gains in carbon income would be offset by a fall in crop margins.”
Having run the Farm Carbon Cutting Toolkit calculator annually, he knows the business sequesters about 400t of carbon dioxide equivalent each year.
An approximate carbon value of £25/t gives a theoretical value of £10,000 a year – very close to the Agreena figure.
Biodiversity net gain
A voluntary biodiversity net gain (BNG) project has also been set up and is now two years in.
Working with a charity, the Trust for Oxfordshire’s Environment, Julian Gold has created a small area of woodland and put some arable land back into chalk grassland.
This gives an income of just over £1,000/ha and a margin similar to the farm’s cropped areas.
“We were early adopters and it could be argued that the payment rate per biodiversity unit should be higher,” he acknowledges.
“However, the voluntary scheme is only 25 years, rather than 30, which makes quite a difference to the price needed.”
The situation will change if the area generates more biodiversity units than originally targeted, he points out.
He accepts that there are still some unknowns with BNG. “There are queries on the tax implications, the timing and size of payments, and the future income potential after the end of agreements.”
Julian also makes the point that, unlike environmental schemes funded by the Rural Payments Agency, the BNG commitment must be delivered.
“Of the 1,200 trees planted, we’ve had to replace 600 of them. And some of the chalk grassland had to be redrilled. It’s not a get-rich-quick scheme.”
BNG project
- 1.2ha woodland and 4.9ha chalk grassland
- Plan to create approximately 13.45 biodiversity units
- Total payment of £155,589 for 25-year agreement
- Amount per unit = £11,588
- Amount per hectare = £25,551 (or £1,022/ha a year)
- Establishment cost = about £32,000
- Ongoing costs about £1,500/year
Total cost over 25 years = £2,780/year (£456/ha a year). Total margin = £86,359 (£566/ha a year) compared with the rest of the farm’s arable area, where the average margin after operating costs is £532/ha.