Soil pest could inflict major Scottish losses
Severe productivity losses can be avoided in grassland and spring cereal ground in central and southern Scotland if leatherjacket burdens are assessed, advises Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC).
SRUC’s “high-risk” warning follows annual leatherjacket survey results revealing 31% of inspected fields have sufficient leatherjacket grubs to cause severe grassland damage.
Farmers are advised to survey fields for leatherjackets (the grub state of the crane fly or daddy-long-legs), which live just below soil level, existing off plants in the growing season.
See also: Pest control challenges ahead as major insecticide is banned
Doing so can save on the time, effort and money of fertilising fields that will later be decimated by grubs.
Survey results
Of the 162 fields sampled, 124 fields (77%) had more than 0.6 million leatherjackets/ha, the level at which noticeable damage can be incurred.
Grub levels and damage
- 0.6 million/ha likely to result in severe damage to spring sown cereals
- More than 1 million/ha in grassland is likely to markedly reduce grass growth
- More than 2 million/ha is likely to result in “severe and visible damage” to grassland swards
The SRUC has advised farms in Argyll and Bute, Ayrshire, Dunbartonshire and Renfrewshire are at particularly high risk.
At the extreme end, the survey found that 31% of fields had more than 2 million leatherjackets/ha at an average of 1.63million/ha, the highest mean population density for three years.
Worsening trend
Professor Davy McCracken, SRUC ecologist, said leatherjackets had seen a 20-year increase, believed to be due to milder and wetter autumns.
He added that last year’s ban on chlorpyrifos (Dursban) makes it even “more important” that farmers plan and limit damage.
He said: “The likely impact on production will depend on the population density of the grubs, the proposed use of the field and, equally importantly, at what point a farmer realises that a damaging level of grubs is present.
“Although chemical control is no longer feasible, farmers still have options if they establish the risk present in each field early enough.”